Angelina Jolie sans boobies?

Now I may be an uptight Englishman, but the idea of Angelina Jolie without boobs makes me think: What's the point?

Perhaps I should back up a bit...

Earlier in the light-month it became publicly known that the woman with the coveted lips, and rack-to-die-for had undergone this surgery thingy as a precautionary measure against breast cancer. In fact HERE is an article she wrote herself about the whole thingy.

Now this whole thing, very possibly makes me hate cancer more than ever.

I'm sure that IF Brad Pitt can deal with life beyond breasts, he'll come to hate it too.  Then again, we are talking about a guy who dumped Jennifer Aniston for a younger hotter "model", who he might think is quickly turning out to be a lemon.  But I still would.

So I suppose it's safe to say she won't be making GIA 2: The Lesbianing any time soon, in fact we've likely seen the end of the token topless scenes in her films, which may translate to the last of her films period.

One must admire Angelina for making such a personal thing public as a way to help other ladies feel more secure in making the same choice... maybe if Brad Pitt tells us all about his colonoscopy, men who are queasy about the idea of getting a foreign finger up the bum would be less squeamish too.

Still, what I find odd is that as if having that kind of embarrassing and personal procedure made public weren't humiliating enough, an artist decided to make topless a painting of Angelina sans-boobs... or at least sans-nipples. So I return to my original question: What is the point?

Is this insensitive? Perhaps, but her well-formed, nippled breasts were a big part of the reason anyone enjoyed seeing her naked in the first place.